A convincing answer still needs a proper check.
A tool produces documents quickly and the leader likes the first examples. A closer review reveals missing conditions and incorrect conclusions. Participants disagree about quality because they assess different aspects of the text and have not agreed a shared evaluation method.
Go straight to the possible work ↓A useful distinction
What makes the output difficult to evaluate?
Not sure yet: general approachConsidering this option: Requirements are clear, but errors appear unpredictably
Where we could start
Gather permitted examples and organise a repeatable evaluation against agreed requirements. Separate significant errors from acceptable limitations, pass observations to technical specialists and prepare a decision about the next stage.
What you would have
Evaluation findings with examples of errors, limits on use and questions requiring technical investigation.
Who needs to be involved
The task owner, specialists reviewing the content and the technical team or solution supplier.
Roles and decisions
I manage the evaluation and preparation of the decision. The technical team investigates causes and possible corrections; a few examples cannot establish guaranteed reliability.
This is a starting point for a conversation. We would check the approach against your task.
Prepare an enquiry
This is an editable starting outline, not a submitted enquiry. Add your own circumstances.