A convincing answer still needs a proper check.
A tool produces documents quickly and the leader likes the first examples. A closer review reveals missing conditions and incorrect conclusions. Participants disagree about quality because they assess different aspects of the text and have not agreed a shared evaluation method.
Go straight to the possible work ↓A useful distinction
What makes the output difficult to evaluate?
Not sure yet: general approachGeneral approach
Where we could start
Clarify the work the output is intended for and who will use it. Identify requirements, available examples and the evaluation needed before drawing a conclusion about suitability.
What you would have
A limited evaluation plan with output requirements, participants and questions for deciding on further use.
Who needs to be involved
The task owner, prospective users and specialists able to assess content and technical limitations.
Roles and decisions
Experience in agreeing requirements and reviewing releases helps organise the evaluation; it does not establish the quality of a particular model. Technical and domain assessments remain with specialists.
This is a starting point for a conversation. We would check the approach against your task.
Prepare an enquiry
This is an editable starting outline, not a submitted enquiry. Add your own circumstances.