# The collaboration changed. Agree the next stage. · The purpose or parties’ interests have changed

All stories are fictional. They do not describe specific people, companies or projects. Any resemblance is coincidental.

The partnership began with a small project. Now there are new clients, additional services and different participants. The original agreements do not explain who makes decisions, how work is divided or which commitments remain. The parties start arguing about individual details.

## Where we could start

I would clarify the parties’ interests and constraints. I would prepare options for continuing, a limited next stage or ending the arrangement, including decisions about current obligations.

## What you would have

Partnership continuation options with consequences and questions for the parties.

## Participants

Authorised partner leaders and owners of existing obligations.

## Roles and decisions

The parties decide whether to continue; legal advisers assess legal consequences.

## Factual experience, separate from the fictional story

Realore: International licensing and distribution of existing games, including partner work.
https://apiperson.com/career/

Tapcore / AirPush / Airnow: Operating work involving people, finance, contracts and specialists across countries.
https://apiperson.com/experience/#work-operations

[There is more work](https://apiperson.com/clients/new-terms/scope/)

[People or responsibilities have changed](https://apiperson.com/clients/new-terms/responsibilities/)

[The purpose or parties’ interests have changed](https://apiperson.com/clients/new-terms/purpose/)

[Book a 30-minute call](https://calendar.app.google/4FrxQkHkAZ32PkzA9)

mailto:apiperson.com@gmail.com